A bridge in Minneapolis crumbles
on 1 August 2007
|Phony witnesses were pre-positioned
In New York City, the television news crews gave us such phony witnesses as this man, who immediately knew exactly why the towers collapsed:
At both the Pentagon and the World Trade Center, government agents confiscated video and other evidence on the grounds that they needed it for the investigation.Zio-Scientists were ready to defend the official lie
Two days after the 9/11 attack, professor Bazant of Northwestern University published a paper to explain that the fire brought the towers down. He did not bother to conduct any investigation."Truth seekers" were in position to confuse
Alex Jones, Mike Rivero, and many other "truth seekers" were ready on 9/11 to mix some lies with the truth. For example, Mike Rivero is still insisting that Flight 77 really did crash into the Pentagon.Zionist agents monitored the real witnesses
There is evidence that at the JFK assassination, the 9/11 attack, and other crimes, some agents are pretending to be ordinary people. Their purpose is to mingle with the real witnesses in order to find out who knows too much. The troublesome witnesses have to be kept away from news reporters, and they would have to be identified. They would have to be confused, blackmailed, or frightened into silence.Was the bridge collapse a Zionist job also?
The behavior of the scientists, engineers, truth seekers, witnesses,
and media suggest that the collapse of the Minnesota bridge was yet another
He could be a Zionist agent whose job was to be a phony witness to create the official story of the collapse, and to find out if any the witnesses knew too much about why the bridge collapsed. You can see him with several of the victims, such as below.
Zio-Scientists were ready to defend the official lie
Within only two days, computer simulations
of the collapse were completed and posted on the Internet. The group that
did the simulations:
Their simulations are simplifications of the collapse, not accurate reenactments based on the evidence, so what good are they, other than propaganda?
youtube.com/watch?v=nqQ4k6zo_ccWhy did only certain sections of the bridge disintegrate?
|"Truth seekers" were in position
Alex Jones, Mike Rivero, Jerome Corsi, and other "investigators" immediately insisted that the collapse was due to the bridge being old; our money being spent on the war rather than on repairing bridges; the large amount of cars using the bridge; and other innocent mistakes. They don't need to investigate the rubble; they already know why the bridge collapsed.
For example, look at Jerome Corsi's article:
is an audio excerpt of Mike Rivero
explaining the collapse to Alex Jones. Rivero complains that some people
blame the collapse on the lack of money spent on highway improvement, and
then he complains that those people never mention that a lot of our money
is going to Iraq.
He and Jones imply that the bridge fell down because Bush is spending our money on war rather than fixing the nation. If the 9/11 attack were to occur today, Rivero and Jones would tell us that the buildings disintegrated because Bush is spending our money on war rather than on maintaining our office buildings.
If these liars are allowed to dominate the "truth movement", that means the criminals will be in control of the investigation of their crime!
The "Nazi" sites tell us the bridge collapsed because of Mexicans, blacks,
and other races:
Sorcha Faal claims it was due to "massive ULF blast":
Why would Zionists want to demolish this bridge?
Prior to the 9/11 attack, the New York City government asked how much
it would cost to remove the World Trade Center towers, and when they discovered
it was going to be very expensive,
they canceled their plans for demolishing the buildings. What a coincidence
that the towers disintegrated from a terrorist attack.
Shouldn't we consider the possibility that the "New World Order" wanted
to replace this bridge, and that they were tired of fighting with city
officials and property owners?
Why aren't the "truth seekers" wondering about this bridge?
Alex Jones complains about a New World Order trying to force a NAFTA superhighway through the country, so why doesn't he take this opportunity to consider that the New World Order destroyed this bridge?
Stranger yet, why is judicial-inc.biz suggesting that the bridge
came down because we are spending lots of our money on Iraq rather than
on maintaining our nation? This is the type of nonsense we would expect
from Jerome Corsi!
As time goes on, it is becoming obvious that there is something wrong with judicial-inc.biz. Did you notice that they don't seem to care about the disappearance of Christopher Bollyn? Who are they? What is their real purpose?
One of our listeners suggested that they might be a group of Jews who don't support Israel, but who support the Rothschilds, or some other group. This would explain why they're willing to criticize Israel, but they are not completely honest in many other areas.
judicial-inc.biz has some amazing information
on Zionist crimes, but that doesn't mean we can trust them. Take their
information, but be suspicious of them.
|So I told the fools, 'Bush is spending all our money on war, so more bridges will fall down!' Now the idiots are inspecting all their bridges!|
|For entertainment, test your knowledge of history and your ability to see through the deception with my History Challenge:|