Paul is Dead:
New evidence based on computer enhanced forensic techniques
7 July 2010
Chiedi chi era quel «Beatle»
(Literal translation: Ask who was that "Beatle")
The cover-story Chiedi
chi era quel «Beatle»
for the July 15 2009 issue of Wired Italia, the Italian edition
of the US magazine Wired, describes the analysis of the McCartney
conspiracy theory conducted by two Italians, Gabriella Carlesi and
Gavazzeni (the man and woman in the photo).
Their purpose for analyzing this conspiracy theory was to provide indisputable,
scientific evidence that would put an end to the persistent rumors that
Paul McCartney had died in a car accident in 1966. However, the results
of their analysis surprised them. Instead of putting an end to the rumors,
their analysis provides scientific evidence that the Paul McCartney of
today is not the same man as the Paul McCartney prior to 1966.
By coincidence, on that same day that this article appeared in Italy,
Paul McCartney was at the Ed Sullivan theater in New York City to appear
on the David Letterman television show and to give a free, outdoor performance
on top of the marquee of the Ed Sullivan theater. He and Letterman laughed
about the silly rumor that Paul McCartney had died in 1966. We could interpret
McCartney's appearance in New York City as an attempt to distract Americans
from the publication of the Italian article, and to encourage Americans
to laugh at the McCartney conspiracy theories.
I will use the name Paul to refer
to Paul McCartney before the 1966 car
accident, and Faul to refer to the
Paul McCartney after the accident.
So, are Paul and Faul the same person?
Who are Gabriella Carlesi
and Francesco Gavazzeni?
Carlesi is forensic pathologist who specializes in identification
of people through craniometry
(i.e. comparison of certain features of the skull) and forensic
odontology (i.e. analysis of the teeth), while Francesco Gavazzeni
is a specialist in computer analyses. By putting their talents together,
they were able to use a computer to obtain high precision measurements
of Paul McCartney's skull from various photos of his face.
Certain features of our skull, teeth, and ears are extremely effective
for identifying us; some of them cannot
currently be modified
by surgery. In fact, in Germany, the identification of the shape of
the right ear has the same legal value of that of a DNA test or fingerprints
|Gabriella Carlesi has been a consultant for identification
of people via digital image processing for various investigations, including:
The identification of Sergei Antonov
in the scenario of the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, in
relation to the "Mitrokhin
Archive" (for an Italian Parliament Commission),
The identification of Francesco Narducci,
connected to the investigation of the so called "Monster
The murder of journalist Ilaria
Alpi and her camera operator Miran Hrovatin (for an Italian Parliament
The assassination of Benito Mussolini
and his mistress Claretta Petacci (for a historical reconstruction).
Forensic evidence based on photographs
The two researchers began their analysis by obtaining high
quality photos of Paul McCartney before and after the car accident. Gavazzeni
complained that some photos taken before 1966 were not properly dated (sometimes
different photo agencies would have different dates for the same photo),
and that some of the best photos were the property of photographers who
were very reluctant to release them. However, they eventually found two
good quality photos dated before 1966 and two after 1967.
Different photos of a human face, in order to be compared, have to be
re-sized to match the same scale; to do this, one feature of the face must
be used as a scaling factor.
These two researchers opted for the distance between the pupils. In
other words, the photos were scaled so that the distance between the pupils
was exactly the same for all of them.
Once photos of a person have been scaled so that the eyes have identical
locations, then if you lay the photos on top of each other, certain features
will match exactly, such as the shape of the skull. The skin and hair may
be very different, but the skulls should be identical.
|Both of the photos taken prior to 1966 matched one another perfectly,
and both of the photos taken after 1967 matched one another perfectly.
However, the researchers were shocked to discover that the photos prior
to 1966 did not match the photos taken
For example, the frontal curvature of the jaw was different (i.e. the
curve going from one ear to the other and passing through the chin, which
you see when looking directly into a face, as in the photos on the right)
and the jaw arc was also different (i.e. the curve of the jaw that you
would see if looking downward at the head from above).
Gavazzeni noticed a common feature of Faul's early photos
that is not seen in his recent photos: a dark area shadowing the external
corner of the left eye. That area now shows something half-way between
a scar and something that resembles skin that was stretched as a consequence
of cosmetic surgery, or, as Gavazzeni suggests, of an imperfect cosmetic
Photos show that Faul's head is more oblong than Paul's head. Gavazzeni
pointed out that some of the early printed photos of Faul must have
been compressed in height in order to make his head appear shorter and
more rounded. He said his conclusion is inescapable because the shape of
the skull of an adult cannot be altered. He said there was a simple trick
for stretching or compressing photos during the printing process in those
days before computer photo editing became available, so it would have been
very easy for them to do this trick.
Carlesi pointed out that the line separating Faul's lips is much wider,
to the point that it was obvious even when Faul grew a mustache, perhaps
in an attempt to hide that detail. Lips can be inflated and increased in
volume, but the wideness of their separating line can be altered only to
a small extent.
More interesting is the position, relative to the skull, of the point
where the nose detaches from the face, because it can not modified by surgery.
According to Carlesi, these points for Paul and Faul are considerably
|Some features of the ear are also useful for identification purposes
because these as well are not modifiable through surgery. Carlesi
and Gavazzeni determined that the ears of Paul and Faul differed significantly.
Teeth can be altered... to a
|Some features of the human body can
be altered, such the position and slope of teeth (dental
braces do this for millions of people).
Carlesi noticed that the teeth configurations for Paul and Faul do not
match, but in a very curious way.
In Paul's mouth, his upper right canine tooth is pushed out of its normal
position because there is not enough room in his jaw for all of his teeth
to fit properly.
In Faul's mouth, that same canine tooth is also crooked, but
there is plenty of room in his jaw
for all of his teeth. Since no other teeth are pushing against the crooked
tooth, how did that tooth become crooked?
Carlesi concludes that the crooked tooth in Faul's mouth was the result
of a dental operation to simulate the
crooked tooth in Paul's mouth.
Carlesi was even more amazed at the difference in the shape
of the palate. It was so narrow in Paul that some teeth were misaligned
(such as the canine tooth mentioned above), but Faul's palate was so wide
that the front teeth did not rotate with respect to their axis, or tilt,
as was happening for Paul, with the only exception of that upper right
canine (mentioned above) which leans outward.
A DNA test!
Carlesi points out that altering the shape of a person's palate, although
possible in the 1960s, would have required a traumatic surgical operation
(the breaking of a bone. She doesn't say which bone, but seems to refer to the
and it would have required the wearing
of fixed dental braces for more than a year. Therefore, if the conspiracy
theories are false - i.e., if the Paul McCartney that we see today with
a large palate is the original Paul McCartney with a small palate - then
Paul went through some very serious dental surgeries, and he would have
suffered for a long time, and it would have had an effect on his voice.
The more logical conclusion is that the Paul McCartney of today is a
substitute, and that Faul went through a much simpler dental operation to
make one of his teeth crooked.
Carlesi and Gavazzeni commented that if McCartney really wanted
to put an end to these rumors, he could have offered to take a DNA test
with his father or his younger brother, Mike, but he didn't. McCartney
took a DNA test only once, but the authors of the article point out that
the DNA test created more confusion and suspicion of his true identity,
Carlesi and Gavazzeni do some
In 1962, when the Beatles were living in Hamburg, Germany and still
unknown to most people, Paul McCartney had a brief affair
with a German woman named Erika Wohlers. She gave birth to a daughter,
Bettina, in December 1962, which was during the time the Beatles were starting
to become famous. The Beatles soon left Germany, and McCartney abandoned
Erica. Around 1967 McCartney agreed to pay 30,000 deutsche marks to support
Bettina, but he was not admitting to being her father, even though she
claims her German birth certificate identifies him as her father!
Once Bettina became an adult, she asked a German court to have McCartney
recognize her as his natural daughter. McCartney had to submit to a DNA
test, and the test showed that he was not her father. Interestingly,
based on an autograph signed by McCartney, together with some photos taken
for the occasion, Bettina accused the person who took that DNA test of
being a substitute for Paul, not the real Paul McCartney! The autograph,
for instance, was signed by somebody right-handed (Paul was left-handed).
More information about this DNA test is here.
Both of the Italian researchers were shocked to discover that
the conspiracy theories appear valid, so at the end of the article they
do some damage control by pointing out that since McCartney is a famous
person, more analyses should be conducted before anybody makes these accusations
so that we can be 100% certain about the conclusion.
Some comments from the readers of the Italian article
Earlier in that article, Gavazzeni admitted that the more they were
pressured to release the results of their analysis, the more they tried
to stall for time because the evidence was pointing in the opposite direction
of what they were hoping for. Unfortunately for them, the more the time
they spent analyzing the evidence, the more certain they became that Paul
McCartney really did die in 1966!
It's also amusing to note that Carlesi said that she had agreed to get
involved in the analysis because she assumed it would require only a few
minutes of her time to prove that Paul and Faul are the same person!
Some readers posted interesting comments at the bottom
of the on-line version of the Wired Italia article:
Reader frabot, on August 22,
2009 at 23:42:07 suggests to watch the Late Show with David Letterman for
July 15, 2009 (is it a coincidence that this is the same date of the publication
of that article by Wired Italia?), in which McCartney jokes about
the idea that Paul died in 1966. That footage is interesting because Faul
seems to lie:
on August 1, 2009 at 13:11:29 claims to have analyzed the voices of Paul
and Faul and that their timbres differ. He also points out that after that
accident the Beatles significantly changed they hair styles, especially
McCartney, who conveniently had slightly longer hair on the right side
of his head.
Reader easytale, on July 30, 2009
at 9:53:35 points out that Faul played live only a very few times, songs
like Yesterday, and that he played them only after the 1980s. And once,
around the year 2000, he played in Canada using his right hand!
Forensic evidence shows that Faul is
Old photos were altered to make Faul
more closely resemble Paul;
Faul went through some dental operation(s)
to have some of his teeth misaligned to mimic Paul's particular defects;
Faul had to learn to become left-handed.
Some questions remain unanswered:
How many people have been threatened,
intimidated, killed, or bribed to keep quiet about this?
this deception? How did the McCartney family benefit from this? How did
the Beatles benefit? How did the fans of the Beatles benefit? How does
the media benefit? Who benefited? If
Paul McCartney died accidentally, would
so many people have joined in this deception? Why would so many people
be willing to participate in the cover-up of a car
accident? Maintaining this deception is extremely difficult,
expensive, and time-consuming, and if nobody benefits, that would be a
sign that this is a cover-up of some type of horrible,
diabolical crime. This may be one of the tricks the Jews are
using to control people in leadership positions. Specifically, the
Jews can threaten people:
obey us, or we'll kill you and replace you with an imitation,
just like we did with Paul McCartney, and nobody will stop us! Not
the sheeple, not the police, not the military, and not even
own family members!
How many more times will we allow the
Jews to perpetrate these type of crimes?
Did you see the 1978 movie Capricorn
One? In that movie, NASA decides to fake the first manned mission to
Mars (I wonder where the Jewish scriptwriter Peter Hyams got this idea
from...). NASA secretly removes the astronauts from the spacecraft and
takes them to a abandoned military base that has a Mars movie set. Then
they perform their landing on Mars and broadcast the video to the world.
However, when the Mars mission is complete and the empty space craft enters
the Earth's atmosphere to return the astronauts, it accidentally burns
up. The astronauts who faked the Mars landing are horrified as they realize
that the world now assumes that all of them are dead!
what would the Jews have done with Faul if his surgery to resemble Paul
ended up terribly wrong? Did he consider such possibilities?
People on the Internet are referring
to Paul McCartney's replacement as "Faul
", but a more appropriate name might be Fool, or Sucker,
or accessory to a horrible crime. Or is he a victim
who was deceived by the people who killed Paul McCartney? Will he continue
to cover up this crime? Or, if we can find enough people to stand up to
the Jewish crime network, will he find the courage to be honest with us?