|America is based on the belief that the majority of people are
capable of taking care of their economy, selecting government officials,
and providing their government officials with sensible policies. However,
the endless crimes that occur in both business and government should be
considered as proof that the majority of people refuse to be responsible
A few of us try to explain that our government is corrupt, but most
people dismiss our "conspiracy theories" without even looking into the
issues. A nation cannot improve when it is under the control of people
who refuse to listen to other opinions.
This problem affects of all nations, not just America. The primary enemy
of every nation is its own people. The people create and support
crummy governments, allow those crummy governments to exploit and manipulate
them, and ridicule people who try to help them understand that their government
is manipulating them. Rather than face the possibility that their nation's
problems are their own fault, most people prefer to blame foreign nations
or some minority of people within their nation.
Stop Blaming Individuals;
The Majority of People are the Enemy
All throughout history, societies, races, and religions have been
blaming one another for their problems. Most people refuse to look critically
at themselves and their friends. The end result is that most people insist
that the world's problems are the result of a few evil people, or some
mysterious force. A few examples are:
Alcohol and other Drugs
Millions of Americans have trouble controlling their use of
alcohol and other drugs. However, rather than take responsibility for their
problems, most Americans blame their parents, or South American drug dealers,
Americans spend millions of dollars each year trying to stop drug abuse
by spraying poisons on the South American farms, smuggling weapons into
their nations, and assisting with assassinations and civil wars. But no
matter how many South Americans we kill, the American people continue to
abuse drugs. We are supposed to believe that those South American drug
dealers have magic powers over the American people. The majority
of Americans simply refuse to face the possibility that each of us
is responsible for our use of alcohol and other drugs.
America's Corrupt Government
Most American voters insist that they are educated and intelligent,
so how do we explain the crummy American government? How could such wonderful
voters create such a lousy government?
Most American blame our crummy government on a few mysterious monsters
with magic powers, such as "Special Interests", or "Rich People". Some
voters blame the Republicans for our lousy government, while other voters
blame the Democrats. Most voters simply refuse to face the possibility
that they created a crummy government because they are incompetent as voters.
Some Americans complain that Jews are dominating many executive positions
in the media and government, and that those few Jews are manipulating a
nation of 280 million non-Jews. Those few Jews supposedly have magic
powers over America.
Most Americans simply refuse to face the possibility that Jews,
the "Special Interests", and the "Rich People" can manipulate a nation
only if the citizens are such jerks that they allow the manipulation.
In regards to Israel, there are lots of Christians in the USA who want
to drive the Arabs out of Palestine. Many Americans (some of them Jewish!)
believe the support of Israel and hatred of Arabs is due to a few Magic
Jews, but millions of Americans would support Israel even if Christians
were the only people living there! The support of Israel has very little,
if anything, to do with Jews. Driving the Moslems out of Palestine has
been a Christian dream for centuries. (Or did this desire come from the
Israel is a part of the Christian religion because it is the birthplace
of Jesus. Also, Jesus and his followers were Jews. Israel, Bethlehem, and
Palestine are in the songs that Christians sing at Christmas.
The Zionists are not the reason Christians have a strong, emotional
attachment to Israel; the Zionists are not making Christians dislike Moslems;
and the Zionists are not making Christians take trips to Bethlehem to visit
the birthplace of Jesus. Rather, the Zionists merely take advantage of
Even if somebody has evidence that the Crusades of the Middle Ages were
the idea of Jews, how could a few Jews manipulate so many Christians and
church officials for so many centuries? Can't Christians think for themselves?
When will Christians take responsibility for their actions? When will Christians
stop accusing other people of controlling them?
Millions of Americans believe Mohammed Atta was successful with the
9-11 attack because he and his friends have magic powers that allowed
them to outsmart the Americans in the Air Traffic Control system, the CIA,
the FBI, and the US Military.
However, the only way Mohammed Atta could get away with the 9-11 attack
is if the American government assisted with (or conducted) the attack.
Millions of people blame President Bush for allowing the 9-11 attack,
but how could Bush be responsible? That attack required lots of people.
Furthermore, covering up the US Government's involvment in the 9-11
attack requires lots of scientists, university professors, and news reporters
to lie about it.
The 9-11 attack was possible because the American voters have given
the USA a corrupt government, a corrupt media, and a corrupt educational
system. Also, there are millions of American citizens willing to take part
I thought I was making a joke years ago when I suggested we
blame a foreign nation for making Americans fat. Today we find Americans
blaming businesses that produce food.
Supposedly, a small number of businessmen have magic powers that
allow them to force the American people to purchase and eat their industrial
food products in excessive quantities.
Americans have become so irresponsible that it is impossible to distinguish
between sarcasm and news.
We also find some Americans complaining that Wal-Mart is taking
over the retail business, as if Wal-Mart is a disease that we have no control
over. Only a few Americans can understand that our economy is whatever
the American people make it. For some examples:
Wal-Mart is growing because millions of Americans prefer to shop there.
The entertainment and drug business is incredibly large because millions
of Americans spend tremendous amounts of money on entertainment and drugs.
American bookstores are dominated by fiction, and the non-fiction books
are written at a 12-year old intellectual level because that is the type
of books that Americans purchase.
American television shows are dominated by sexual titillation, sarcasm,
and violence because those are the shows that the American people prefer.
A free enterprise economy is whatever the consumers make it.
The American economy is not controlled by Wal-Mart, "Special Interests",
corporate executives, Jews, or "Rich People".
Unfortunately, only a small number of Americans can understand (and/or
accept) this concept. Most Americans imagine that they are helpless victims
of evil monsters rather that take responsibility for their actions.
Nearly one-third of the American population is former African
slaves or Mexican servants. Mexicans may be coming into this nation at
a rate of more than a million per year. Many of the Mexicans are uneducated
and illiterate, and many cannot speak English, and some can barely read
and write Spanish, but it does not matter because they can easily find
jobs. This attracts even more Mexicans.
At the same time Americans are providing jobs to the Mexicans who arrive
illegally, they complain about the Mexicans who come into the nation illegally!
Supposedly, the Mexicans -- including the Mexicans who are uneducated,
illiterate, and cannot speak English -- have
magic powers that allow
them to force the American people to provide them with jobs -- and at the
expense of American citizens who want those jobs!
Most Americans simply refuse to take responsibility for bringing
slaves and servants into this nation.
Also, I have personally heard many Americans (including some of my own
relatives!) insist that slavery was necessary because only Africans
were capable of dealing with the heat of the Southern plantations. But
while Americans insist that slavery was necessary for our ancestors, they
condemn the slavery of other nations.
Most people want to be King (or Queen)
If most people could have their dreams come true, they would be like George
Bush. Specifically, they would inherit lots of money (or win lots of money
from gambling) and they would spend their lives drinking alcohol, playing
games, and authorizing wars, while hordes of servants pamper them, provide
them with food, and repair their fleet of automobiles.
The majority of people want to play like children, while somebody else
grows the food, learns the technical skills, fixes the plumbing, and cleans
up the garbage. Only a small number of people will learn useful skills
and do useful work without being forced into it.
Also, most people refuse to accept responsibility for problems. According
to most Americans, a small number of Magic Mexicans, Magic Jews, Magic
Arabs, Magic Drug Dealers, Magic Corporate Executives, and various other
Magic and Evil Creatures are destroying America.
When will the human race face the reality that the majority of people
in every nation are ignorant, irresponsible, conceited jerks who are ruining
their nation? When will the human race stop blaming a small number of "evil
An example; A Hospital
Imagine a hospital in which the doctors are selected by the voters of the
city. Also, imagine that their are no standards for either the voters
or the candidates to meet. People such as Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and
Bill Clinton are allowed to run for the position of "doctor".
Do you think that you, your friends, your family, and your neighbors
would take the election of doctors seriously? Would you be willing to go
to a doctor that your friends and neighbors voted for?
I think that allowing "The People" to vote for doctors would result
in a hospital that appears to belong in a Hollywood horror movie. Specifically,
many of the doctors would be incompetent and corrupt.
Now let's imagine that the voters elect George Bush to be a doctor.
After a few of his patients die or suffer from inappropriate treatments,
many voters would complain that Doctor Bush is an incompetent doctor. They
would become angry at Doctor Bush, and some would demonstrate in the streets
to have him removed. Some people would demand Doctor Bush be arrested and
put in jail for all the patients who suffered under his care. But Doctor
Bush is not the problem; the problem is the jerks who voted to make
George Bush a doctor. Unfortunately, the voters will never blame themselves,
their friends, or their neighbors.
To make the analogy more complete, imagine that Haliburton and Enron
executives decide to take advantage of the situation by cheating the hospital.
And imagine that Zionists convince the hospital personnel to donate 15%
of their profits and supplies to Israel on a yearly basis. Who is really
to blame for the corruption and abuse at such a hospital?
How many innocent Americans died in 9-11?
Continuing with the hospital analogy, imagine I wrote a book that provided
evidence that the doctors at the hospital were so incompetent and corrupt
that nobody should go the hospital under any circumstance. Next imagine
that a few people read my book and try to discuss the information with
their friends and relatives. However, their friends and relatives -- who
I will refer to as "Patriots" -- dismiss me as a conspiracy nut.
Instead of discussing the corruption at the hospital, these Patriots change
the conversation to the Academy Awards or Harry Potter.
By refusing to discuss the problems of the hospital, the Patriots prevent
their friends and family from learning about the dangers of going to the
hospital. The Patriots inadvertently suppress information about the corruption.
Now imagine that you break a bone in your leg and naively go to the
hospital to get a cast. Doctor George Bush gives you the bad news that
you must have your leg amputated. In reality he chose to amputate your
leg simply because he makes more profit from an amputation. Later, as you
recover from the operation, one of the hospital staff rapes you. Months
later you discover my book, and you realize that if you knew about the
information in my book, you never would have gone to the hospital.
Would you blame Dr. Bush and the hospital staff for your amputation
and rape? Or would you blame your Patriotic friends and neighbors for electing
the incompetent hospital staff, and for suppressing information about the
corruption? Who is truly guilty of criminal behavior in this scenario?
a) The incompetent doctors.
b) The Patriotic voters who selected the incompetent doctors,
and who suppressed valuable information that the "conspiracy nuts" were
What if 20% of the hospital's patients died while under the care of Doctor
Bush? Would those dead patients be "innocent victims" of a corrupt and
incompetent hospital? Or would those dead patients be victims of the "irresponsible
Patriots" who selected the incompetent doctors and who suppressed the valuable
information provided by the "conspiracy nuts"?
How absurd would the situation have to be before you blamed the voters
for the problems at the hospital? For example, what if the voters elected
Jeff Dahmer as Doctor, and what if Doctor Dahmer was eating many
of his patients? Would that be absurd enough for you to agree with me that
the voters are incompentent? Or would the voters have to elect a dog
or a cartoon character before you agreed with me? What if the voters
elected Mickey Mouse as Doctor?
Now consider how this hospital analogy applies to America. The American
voters always select incompetent and corrupt government officials. When
a few of us provide evidence that our government is conducting scams, most
people ridicule us as
Conspiracy Nuts. Instead of discussing our
problems, most Americans discuss the Academy Awards, Harry Potter, and
football games. As a result, almost everybody is aware of the Harry Potter
books, but information about our nation's problems is suppressed.
If you had died in the 9-11 attack, who should be blamed for your death?
Would you blame President Bush? Or would you blame the voters for electing
incompetent government officials and for ridiculing the "conspiracy nuts"
who expose the corruption? How many of the 3000 Americans who died during
the 9-11 attack were "innocent victims"? And how many should instead be
classified as "irresponsible jerks who became victims of their own inability
to create a respectable government, and who deserve what they got"?
Nothing will improve with America until we deal with the true cause
of this nation's problems. America is not a victim of George Bush,
or the Magic Arabs, the Magic Jews, the Magic Corporate Executives, etc;
rather, America is a victim of my mother, my sister, my brother,...
and most of your family members, friends, and neighbors. Most people
should not vote!
The majority of voters are ignorant, conceited people who are easily
manipulated, and who consistently elect crummy government officials. And
then they become angry at the government officials rather than either quit
voting or make an attempt to become a better voter. Also, they ignore
or become angry at people such as myself when we try to help them understand
these issues. Their ridiculing of us as "conspiracy nuts" is suppressing
discussions of our problems.
When a person suppresses information about a burglary or bank robbery,
he can be charged with a crime. The Americans who ridicule the "Conspiracy
Nuts" about 9-11 are helping to suppress valuable information about it.
Therefore, why not consider those particular Americans to be accessories
to the 9-11 crime since they help suppress valuable information about
it? Why not arrest millions of those "Patriots"?
Blame the losers, not the winners
The USA was created by murdering, lieing, and supposedly even giving blankets
infected with smallpox to the native Americans. The native Americans also
killed one other. The Incas and Mayans, for example, conquered many of
All nations have this same violent history. If one nation is wrong for
conquering its neighbors, why aren't all nations wrong? Conversely,
if the USA is righteous for taking land away from the native Americans
and the Hawaiians, other people are just as righteous for taking land away
If smallpox is released on the American population, how is that any
more wrong than when the "American Pioneers" did the same to the native
Americans? If the CIA, Mossad, China, Britain, or Russia were to conquer
America, why not refer to them as "Pioneers"?
If the USA is destroyed, it will be because the American people allowed
it to happen. Life has always been a competitive struggle for both animals
and humans. The weaker societies always fall victim to their stronger neighbors.
If the USA is destroyed, it will be because the American people failed
to take care of their nation. Don't blame the victorious group; rather,
blame the losers -- blame the American people.
Jefferson, Washington, and others created a nation for the American
people, and if the USA is destroyed, it is because the American people
could not maintain it.
School's Over; Time To Play!
Only a small number of people will continue to learn once they leave school.
As soon as school is over, most people never again read serious material.
Instead, they spend their time and money on Harry Potter, Newsweek,
and similar entertainment material that is at the intellectual level of
a 12 year-old child. Most Americans pay more attention to the Academy Awards
then they do to the elections of government officials, our foreign policy,
and our economy.
Most Americans refuse to learn about or discuss our foreign policies.
The end result is that most Americans do not know that the USA helped Saddam
get control of Iraq, gave him weapons, and encouraged him to fight a war
with Iran. Saddam and Osama were two of many CIA policies that backfired.
Yet the ignorant Americans believe they are entitled to authorize bombings
of Iraq in order to free the world from Saddam and Osama!
The fact that other nations tolerate the brutal, selfish, and idiotic
American policies is a sign that their citizens are also ignorant,
irresponsible, and incompetent. How can the world improve when every nation
is dominated by irresponsible people?
Why do Americans resist the metric system?
Some people in other nations learn more than one language; by comparison,
most Americans refuse to learn something as simple as the metric system.
However, Americans frequently boast of being a nation of with a strong
"work ethic". So why do Americans resist switching?
We waste time and money by having both systems. Furthermore, the metric
system can be phased in over several generations, so most adults don't
have to learn it. So why are most Americans resisting the metric system?
The majority of Americans are simply terrifed at the thought of learning
something new. America has never had a "work ethic"; rather, this nation
has always had a "slave and servant ethic". The majority of Americans want
to retire, not work. The majority of Americans want servants, not skills.
The majority of Americans want to spend all their time on entertainment
while their slaves and servants pamper them. Most Americans want to play
like children all day, every day; they do not want to help make
a better nation.
The resistance to the metric system is coming from the majority of Americans,
and it is simply due to the fear of learning something new. Aside from
using military force, the only way to get Americans to switch to the metric
system would be to offer them a lot of money to learn it.
Manipulation is as Old as Prostitution
All throughout history a small number of people have been manipulating
the majority of people. For example, a few decades ago some Catholic Churches
were putting emotional pressure on people who resisted attending their
services, such as putting their names on a list of people who misbehaved.
A few centuries earlier the Catholic Church was even worse; they were
supporting wars, extracting lots of money and services from the people,
and getting people angry at witches and non-Catholics. It is possible that
the Bush administration is treating the public with more decency than the
Catholic Church was a few centuries ago. Galelio might tell us that the
Bush administration is an improvement over what he experienced.
Manipulating the public is not a new concept developed by the
Bush administration; manipulating the public may be as old as prostitution.
Advertising agencies even make a living from it.
How Do We Improve Our Situation?
I doubt that we can help the majority of people understand that they are
their worst enemy. People can easily be motivated to hate and fight, but
not to learn, think, or become more responsible.
One lesson the world should learn from the 9-11 scam is that a nation
must set higher standards for government officials and voters. An unskilled,
alcoholic prince (eg, George Bush) should not even quality for a high level
position in government. Who among us would have hired that guy for anything
other than unskilled labor? Yet many of my relatives and neighbors, along
with millions of other Americans, consider George Bush to be an intelligent,
educated, hard working man who can lead this nation into prosperity and
People in foreign nations often insult George Bush, but how are their
government officials any better than George Bush? Foreigners can easily
find problems with America, but they cannot see that their own governments
are just as crummy.
We have to face the fact that there is a reason scams occur in every
nation year after year, decade after decade. The reason is that most people
refuse to think, learn, face unpleasant issues, or risk criticism.
Ignore the Majority
All progress comes from a tiny group of people. The only way to make the
world better is to find that small minority that has the ability to do
something; discuss what to do; and then do it -- even if the majority of
people complain. The majority of people are ignorant, arrogant, irresponsible,
and hypocritical. Also, most people refuse to learn or think. We should
not care what the majority of people want, nor should we ask them for their
opinions on how to make the world a better place.
Thomas Jefferson didn't ask the majority of people if they wanted to
break away from England, and if so, what they wanted the new nation to
be. IBM scientists don't ask the majority of people what sort of experiments
to conduct. Airplane pilots don't ask the passengers how to fly the airplane.
When the founders of the USA got together to discuss independence from
England, they did not conduct polls to find out what "The People"
wanted, nor did they invite the "The People" to their meetings. Instead,
they created the Constitution by themselves.
The founders of the USA could be described as "an elite group of intellectuals"
who felt superior to the common citizen. Those "elitists" designed a new
government without asking the common people for their opinions. Then George
Washington formed a military to bring the new government into existence.
Most of the colonists were just sheep who didn't know about -- or care
about -- what has happening. If the British had defeated Washington, the
founders would have been considered "criminals" who were trying to "take
control of the colonies".
Every nation has a few people like Thomas Jefferson; specifically, people
who are capable of discussing the creation of a better society. These few
people should begin discussing what to do with America and the world. We
should ignore the majority of people as we make decisions on how to improve
The USA needs an updated Constitution that is better suited for our
era. For example, Jefferson never considered the effect TV has on people,
so he never bothered to deal with issue of a small group of people controlling
all TV news. And Jefferson never knew that the process of running for government
office would become expensive and ridiculous by the 20th century.
After an improved Constitution is developed, we need a group of military
people to take the role of George Washington and fight our current government.
They would have to conquer America without any concern with what the Sheeple
have to say about it.
An interesting aspect of creating a nation is that all nations are created
by small groups of people, but if the small group fails, they are considered
to be a group of "thugs" or "elitists" or "terrorists" who were trying
to "take over the nation against the wishes of the people".
Ignoring the majority of people may seem to put us in the same category
as Stalin, Hitler, and Bush, but it depends on who "we" are. If
"we" are a group of respectable people, we would be like respectable fathers
and mothers who ignore what their young children want.
What Kind of Freaks are in Control?
If we do nothing to help the world, we are simply allowing other people
to manipulate the public. This would be acceptable to me if those other
groups were making a better world, but are they?
For example, is the Bush family, the Rockefeller family, and other rich
families trying to make a better nation for us? Or are they trying to bring
back the Middle Ages in which a few wealthy families control the nation
and the majority of us are their servants?
And what is the goal of the CIA or FBI? It seems that the CIA are dominated
by people who are mentally ill. For example, they seem to have the attitude
that they will solve the world's problems with assassinations, weapons,
LSD, and war. These are policies I would expect from an angry, 10-year
The CIA has failed over and over to make the world a better place with
their killings, but they never notice. For example, how did the killing
of President Kennedy help America, or the world? Sure, the killers got
away with the murder because they fooled the majority of people into thinking
Oswald did it. But it seems to me that the killing of President Kennedy
reduced morale in America, reduced respect for the US government, and encouraged
even more corruption.
How many times does the CIA, FBI, and others have to fail before they
consider the possibility that their policies are causing more harm than
good? (Or are these agencies trying to destroy the USA in order to make
it easier for them to grab control of the nation? If so, then they are
And how has the MI6 helped Britain? How has the KGB helped Russia? Has
secret agency really done something to help their nation? It is possible
that these agencies are dominated by unemployable, mentally ill people;
social misfits who would be in jail if it were not for these secret agencies.
America was not created by a secret agency that conducted secret assassinations.
While there may have been some secret killings, the creation of America
came mainly from people such as Thomas Jefferson when they openly discussed
the issue of creating a better nation. We should do the same as Thomas
Jefferson. Specifically, we should begin discussing how to make better
nations. We don't need secrecy for this; rather, we should be doing this
in front of the world. Also, we don't need weapons for this, nor do we
need to conduct secret assassinations.
The USA and South Africa; Cravings for Slaves
I think the USA is hopeless. The biggest problem we face today is the same
that South Africa faced; namely, Americans have a tremendous desire for
slaves (or servants, or whatever you want to call them). Eventually racial
fights will break out between the white Americans and their Mexican, African,
and other servants. Already some Mexicans are talking of getting back "their"
land. This attitude will become more common during the next decade.
A government of Mexicans is acceptable to me, but I see two problems
with a racial war:
I doubt if other nations will ignore a civil war in the USA. We have too
much valuable land and resources, and lots of dangerous weapons. The economy
of America has a large effect on the economy of other nations, so a civil
war in America will affect the rest of the world in a bad way. I think
other nations will get involved in our civil war, but for their
benefit, not ours. Russia may grab Alaska, for example. And once the USA
is gone, how long will Canada remain independent?
The government(s) that replace the dead USA will certainly be just as crummy
as -- or worse than! -- the Bush administration since our slaves and servants
are no better at voting than their masters. Replacing George Bush with
a Mexican version of the same jerk is hardly an improvement.
Why Wait for the Ship to Sink?
How can the USA survive much longer when it is dominated by people who
refuse to take responsibility for themselves? How can this nation avoid
self-destruction when most Americans believe the solution to all self-inflicted
problems is to blame somebody else, and then kill them?
Why wait for the USA to become completely devastated? Why not face the
fact that the USA is a hopeless, dying nation? Why not start discussing
the creation a new nation before the ship sinks? Why wait for a civil war
to break out? Why not discuss the mistakes of the past, take the good aspects
of the Constitution, and start the process of making an improved government?
When Do We Stop Investigating the JFK Scam?
Hundreds, maybe thousands, of people have been trying to expose the killing
of President Kennedy as a scam, but what have they accomplished after 40
years? Our history books and encyclopedias continue to teach children
that Oswald killed Kennedy by himself.
Just as the CIA fails time after time with their killings, the Kennedy
researchers fail year after year to correct the lies in our history
books. And just as the CIA never notices that they fail repeatedly, the
Kennedy researchers never notice that they are failing. Instead, the Kennedy
researchers continue to study the issue and interview witnesses on the
false assumption that they will come across the magic evidence that will
prove the killing was a scam. They believe this magic evidence will cause
Americans to correct their history books and fix their government.
As I tried to explain in Chapters 11 and 12 of Painful Questions,
An Analysis Of The September 11th Attack, the killing of JFK is such
an obvious scam that a person only has to read a small portion of
the Warren Report to realize it. We don't need any more evidence.
Rather, we need to face the fact that the majority of people do not want
to learn, think, risk criticism, or deal with problems.
We must ignore the majority of people, not waste our lives trying to
provide them with even more evidence that the JFK killing was a scam. Further
research into the JFK killing is useful only to understand the masterminds
of the killing and their motives.
The same situation is occurring with the September 11th attack. Specifically,
hundreds of people are searching for the magic evidence that proves that
the attack was a scam. However, no matter how much evidence we provide,
the majority of people will refuse to look at it or deal with it. If the
combination of my book (Painful Questions) and my video (Painful
Deceptions) is not enough evidence for a person, why should we bother
trying to provide him with more evidence?
I say we already have enough evidence to prove the attack was a scam.
I think the people who cannot see the scam after reading my book and watching
my video are simply refusing to face reality. Why should we waste our time
with such people?
We should provide people with the evidence that the 9-11 attack was
a scam, but ignore the majority of people who refuse to look at the evidence.
We should spend our time on useful activities, not on trying to educate
people who refuse to think. For example, we could spend some time on the
How do we create a government in which the majority of people are told
to keep their mouths shut, without that government turning into a selfish
dictatorship, such as Russia under Joseph Stalin?
We need higher standards for government officials, but what should the
standards be? And how do we prevent a group of people from manipulating
the system in such a manner that they and their friends get control of
We need higher standards for voters, but what should the standards be?
And how do we prevent a group the people from manipulating the system so
that they and their friends are allowed to vote, but not you or I?
If we can create respectable governments in every nation,
the entire world would become a wonderful place. But how can we give ourselves
respectable governments if we waste our lives trying to convince the majority
of people that the JFK killing or the 9-11 attack was a scam? We must change
the world by ourselves; we must ignore the majority of people.
How Do We Begin To Improve The World?
We need to get attention and spread this information. I would start by
exposing a simple scam. Specifically, from what I have seen, not many intelligent
people in foreign nations believe Apollo astronauts landed on the moon.
So why not start with that scam? I created a 2-page PDF file in the form
of a Science Challenge about whether Apollo astronauts landed on the moon.
This Science Challenge is great for people who think they know science,
especially science professors and students. Ask people to explain that
The Science Challenge is in html
format or as a 150 kb PDF file
You may wonder, "What good does it do to get people talking about the
Apollo scam?" The answer is that it proves that the American government,
news reporters, universities, and businesses have deceived the world on
a very large scale, and for decades. It would also show that American history
books contain lies.
Most people will not question history books, encyclopedias, or television
news reporters. Exposing the Apollo scam can be visualized as grabbing
Peter Jennings by his hair, pulling off a rubber mask, and exposing a devil.
In other words, exposing the Apollo scam would prepare people to accept
the possibility that the September 11th attack was a scam. From what I
have personally seen, the September 11th attack was a scam on such a large
scale that many people simply cannot believe it is a scam.
One reason some Americans insist that Apollo really did land on the
moon is that they assume that other nations, especially Russia, would have
exposed the scam -- if it had been faked. The silence from other nations
is proof to these people that Apollo astronauts actually did land on the
moon. Therefore, by proving the Apollo moon landing is a fake, it would
show that other nations are so corrupt that they do not expose the scams
of America for fear that America will retaliate and expose their
Some people believe Apollo landed on the moon simply because it seems
too stupid to fake a moon landing. These people ask: "Why
would the government fake a moon landing?" Or, "Why would the government
spend billions of tax dollars to a fake moon landing?"
Although many people distrust governments, they assume that governments
behave in a reasonably sensible manner. Once people realize that NASA,
universities, businesses, and other government officials have already spent
billions of dollars on the idiotic faking of a moon landing, it should
become easier to discuss the September 11th attack.
Eventually we could discuss the more important topics, such as the need
to set much higher standards for government officials and voters rather
than continue the policy of allowing anybody to be a government
official and a voter.
I think the September 11th attack should be used as evidence that the
majority of people are incompetent voters and irresponsible citizens who
are easily manipulated. The 9-11 attack shows that when a nation allows
to vote, they end up with a nation that is so corrupt that buildings can
be blown up in front of their faces, and that moon landings can be faked.
Will Al-Queda attack us again? Try this: Upcoming